.....Advertisement.....
.....Advertisement.....

Today's Opinions

  • Review of culture study reveals excellent work cited

    Numbers got the emphasis in the first half of the recently released report on arts, culture and creativity by the Department of Cultural Affairs. The second half, another hundred pages, commendably went places few are willing to consider for fear of ruffling self-righteousness.
    A month ago, I skipped lightly through the numbers. Today’s topic is the rest. To find the report, “Building on the Past, Facing the Future: Renewing the Creative Economy of New Mexico,” see newmexicoculture.org, the site of the Department of Cultural Affairs.
    Recognizing that numbers take one only so far, the researchers from the University of New Mexico’s Bureau of Business and Economic Research did “structured in-depth interviews with 123 professionals engaged in 15 areas of creative work” and included results from 85 other interviews. That’s not many. No “authoritative census” of our creative professionals exists. Accept that BBER carefully assembled the interview group.

  • Making the ballot but not Duran's way

    New Mexico Secretary of State Dianna Duran got her comeuppance in a case before the state Supreme Court a couple of weeks ago.
    She was adequately represented in the case by a private attorney of her choosing (paid for with taxpayer dollars, of course) when she appeared before the five justices. Nonetheless, she lost in a unanimous ruling, five-to-zip.
    As state law and custom have it, when the governing bodies of New Mexico counties approve measures for voters to consider in a general election, it falls to the Secretary of State to see to it that those measures are duly and properly placed on the general election ballot.
    The Secretary of State, after all, is the state’s chief election official, responsible for preparing and superintending printing of the ballots that await voters in their polling places come Election Day.
    So when the county commissions of two New Mexico counties, Santa Fe and Bernalillo, passed and submitted to Secretary Duran a pair of non-binding measures asking voters whether they would support decriminalizing the possession of small quantities of marijuana, the two counties’ commissioners had every reason to assume the Secretary of State would do her duty by putting the questions on the November ballot.

  • Public banking gets a hearing at symposium

    With tighter credit standards that have resulted in fewer loans since the recession of 2008, some are backing an effort to open a publicly owned and managed bank in New Mexico. These advocates are holding a symposium in Santa Fe on Sept. 27 to educate the public and decide how to proceed.
    State Rep. Brian Egolf (D-Santa Fe) has pushed for a statewide public bank for years, arguing it would keep more money at home and make it easier for businesses to secure capital. Fellow legislators have rejected the idea for two successive years, so backers have scaled down the idea to a publicly owned bank in just one New Mexico community: Santa Fe. They have the support of the city’s mayor, Javier Gonzales, who sees it as a resource for cash-strapped local businesses.
    Some local bankers are skeptical, citing capital availability, but little loan demand from business owners reluctant to take on more debt before they see a strong turnaround in the economy.

  • Know risks before cosigning a loan

    Shakespeare probably said it best: “Neither a borrower, nor a lender be, for loan oft loses both itself and friend.” Four hundred years later, people still wrestle with whether or not to help out a loved one by loaning them money or cosigning a loan.
    Perhaps you want to help your kid qualify for a better student loan rate or assist your widowed mom with refinancing her mortgage. Before you cosign anything, however, make sure you understand the risks involved.
    Here are just a few of the things that can go wrong and questions to ask before committing yourself — and your good credit — to what could be a decades-long commitment:
    First, understand that the main reason you’re being asked to cosign a loan is because lenders don’t think the borrower is a good risk. By cosigning, you’re guaranteeing that you’ll repay the full loan — plus any late fees or collection costs — should the borrower default.
    If that doesn’t scare you sufficiently, read on:
    • Even one late or missed payment can damage your credit.
    • In most states, the creditor can — and probably will — go after you for repayment without first trying to collect from the borrower, because they know you’re more likely to have the money.

  • Changes would hurt utility customers

    All those who have served on both the Utilities Board and the County Council — and have seen the relationship between them from both sides — feel strongly that the proposed change in the charter would be damaging both to utility users and county citizens in general.
    I have been overseeing or watching Utilities Department operations for more than 30 years. My experience during the 10 years I spent on the County Council and my 10 years on the Utilities Board make me believe that the present charter affecting utilities has worked very well.
    The proposed change could lead to utility funds being drained to support other county undertakings instead of being reinvested in utility infrastructure. The proposed change would also expose utility rates and services to politically motivated manipulation that often benefits special interests to the detriment of most customers.
    Please vote “against” Question 2.

    Lawry Mann
    Former County Council, BPU member
     

  • Protect pets from rabies

    Although the rabies virus is commonly known for causing a life-threatening disease, many people are unaware of what exactly it entails and how to prevent its transmission. In honor of World Rabies Day on Sept. 28, here is some information to help further raise awareness about rabies and how to help protect your family and pets from this deadly disease.
    Rabies is an infection affecting the central nervous system, or brain and spinal cord, of humans and animals. This infection is caused by a virus that is transmitted primarily from bites wounds, scratches, or tissue from an infected animal. It is nearly always deadly if not treated before the beginning of symptoms.
    “Symptoms include fever, lethargy, seizures and ultimately paralysis,” said Dr. Stacy Eckman, lecturer at the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. “This paralysis can include paralysis of the muscles that control swallowing, leading to a ‘fear of water,’ or ‘hydrophobia’ that is often described with rabies.” Behavior changes leading to abnormally aggressive behavior may also occur.

  • A dream not yet realized

    Last week, I read Thalia Gibbs-Jackson’s letter to the editor with great interest and equally great sorrow. In my lifetime, I’ve witnessed a lot of racism and every now and then, I make the mistake of thinking that things are getting better in this world.
    I suppose with age comes blind hope, but the simple fact is that we haven’t come as far in the past 50 years as one might think. In fact, at times I think we’ve regressed.
    First, let me say that my criticism of racist attitudes is not meant to single out Los Alamos. Whether Democrat and Republican, rich or poor, educated or not, anyone can be a bigot. One thing positive you can say about racism is that it is an equal-opportunity social disorder.
    Sadly, it’s all too human to have these feelings. We all have prejudices that are tattooed into our psyche at a very young age and which can take a lifetime to shake off.
    My earliest memory of racial differences goes back to Kindergarten. I was playing in the apartments courtyard and I saw a black kid standing on the other side of the road. I walked over and yelled out, “Chocolate bar!” He yelled back, “Vanilla bar!”
    We then both ran home crying.

  • Changes needed for outdated Los Alamos County Charter

    On Nov. 4, we will be asked to vote on two questions on the ballot related to the County Charter, a document that was adopted by the voters and that has served us well for many years.
    I am a longtime resident of Los Alamos. I grew up in Los Alamos, have served on a county board and on the County Council, and I have spent quite a few hours of my life since 2010 serving on the Charter Review Committee (CRC), where we went through the current charter very carefully before recommending to the council the changes now before you.
    The people who crafted our current charter, passed in 1968 when Los Alamos was completing the transition from a government-run community to a self-governing, home-rule community, were friends and acquaintances of my parents. They did important work and I respect their efforts.
    However, the time has come to make some changes to the charter and I will support the two questions when I go to polls. The first question, which has to do with the structure of government, goes into a little more detail about the duties and responsibilities of the council chair, specifies that the council chair must be elected annually, and strengthens the recognition of the council chair as the head of the government.