.....Advertisement.....
.....Advertisement.....

Letters

  • 'Marty' shouldn't be blamed

    I’m disappointed that the Los Alamos Monitor would run an article about “Shock on the Rock”. I understand the sensitivity of the situation, but the “Rock” is public property. The story was unfair to the party who painted the rock “Marty makes 40 look Sporty.”Marty” shouldn’t have to change his birthday.
    I remember one time I painted the rock. I had planned it for weeks. It was to welcome members from several states to a private function at Overlook Park on a particular Memorial Day.
    I waited until the day before the function. My children and I painted the rock accordingly, but I admit, I felt a little guilty painting over the artwork that was already on the rock. But I did it anyway, feeling obligation to the club to which I had promised I would paint the rock. It didn’t even last 24 hours. Members of the club began arriving the next day, but the rock my kids and I had painted was obliterated by 10 a.m. the morning of the event. I’m glad I got a photo.
    So the bottom line is, please don’t make “Marty’s” family feel guilty. Somebody had to do it. And whatever we do, let’s not impose some complicated permitting process for the rock. It’s one of the few true freedoms we have left.
    John Stephenson
    White Rock

     

  • Drop dead point for N.M. 502

    The county has finally reached the drop-dead point with regard to the redo of N.M. 502 from Knecht to Tewa Loop. The hastily generated design created by PW in January was done without serious critiquing, endorsed by the Transportation Board under questionable circumstances, and approved quickly by the council as it “needed to rush this through urgently to insure funding”, even as some of us indicated that it would not meet LOS.
     This design has now been soundly rejected by state (NMDoT) and federal (FHWA) agencies based on LOS. We are now finding that another design is to be presented to the council for quick approval. Again, the Transportation Board has approved a design at its Dec. 6 meeting that was only made public at their meeting. Council will be discussing this design tonight in chambers. Again, as before, this design has not been through the scrutiny that council insisted on last year for an acceptable design of this portion of N.M. 502 to insure that the circumstances that were encountered with the Trinity redo were not repeated. I am sure that the new Administrator will be quite sensitive to minimizing these continued embarrassments to the council.

  • Hitting the nail on the head

    As always John Bartlit “hit the nail right on the head” with his usual completely scientifically factual and therefore honestly presented article entitled:
    Key to fracking is tell-tale data, Los Alamos edition that was published Thursday.
    As LANL’s conscientious and highly trained water-treatment/pollution, waste-disposal and associated analytical chemists, geologists contractors etc. have known so well for the past 70+ years, the use of harmless chemical  tracers that reveal pathways of pollutants in air, water, the body and food chains are vital to ensuring their sources can be located and prevented from further contamination. Their efforts although mainly satisfactory are never complete and are amongst the most important continuing scientific challenges at the lab.
    Returning to John’s specific discussion about the need for such date from the proposed fracking and oil-shale operations in New York State, once again we are up against the “commercial gorilla in the room” who is thinking only in terms of short-term energy supply and financial gain.

  • Vote yes on the school bond

    Four years ago while president of the LAPS School Board, I wrote a letter to the editor explaining the motivation for the 2009 school bond election.
     In that letter, I appealed to the community to consider a significant bond in order to reverse a deteriorating trend; namely, that some of our key school facilities were in dire need of serious attention.  Further, I stated that we could not afford major replacement of entire facilities; that we could only afford phased renovation or replacement projects to add years of useful life to our existing facilities.
    A “frugal” 20-year facilities renewal plan was developed to prioritize and guide our attention and phased investments. The plan’s guiding premise was renovate and only when renovation is not cost effective was replacement to be even considered.  The plan directed we concentrate on the high and middle schools first, followed by Aspen elementary.  Priorities were also established to address corrective maintenance projects at all school sites.

  • Support the school bond

    Next January, we have an opportunity to make Los Alamos more inviting to the young families that are essential to the future of LANL (and Los Alamos).
    On May 10, 2007, I attended the first meeting of the Los Alamos Public Schools (LAPS) Facility Planning Committee (FPC).  The school board had asked me, Larry Goen, Al Moelenback, Stan Primak and Grant Stewart to serve with two board members and LAPS staff with the goal of developing “a long-range facility asset management program aligned with the district’s fundamental mission.”  We were assisted by Bob Robie, a registered architect from the firm, Architectural Research Consultants (ARC).  ARC is a unique architectural consulting firm specializing in the areas of planning, architectural programming, facility evaluation, and architectural research.
    We by evaluating the condition of our schools and then recommending remodeling or rebuilding depending on the life cycle cost.  We toured all the schools and met with LAPS facilities staff.  In our 20-year plan to address needs at all schools our highest priorities were to renovate the high school and middle school, to replace Aspen school and to enhance major maintenance at the other schools.  

  • Be civil when talking politics

    Now that the election is over and tempers have cooled, I would like to explore why election times have to be so vitriolic? Why can not an election dialogue be civil? We should be very thankful for the numerous freedoms that we, as Americans enjoy and often take for granted — such as voting, freedom of speech, and a right to our own personal opinions. America is one of the few countries that can have a complete change in governing regimes without mass upheavals from the people, yet we choose to attack those with whom we disagree with vile words.
    The past presidential election discourses seemed to abound with an insatiable desire to belittle those with differing ideas. Political ads, which came in spades, were revolting in the way they attacked the opposing party. Often the attacks were not focused on particular issues, but rather were replete with slanderous verbiage. What happened to the days of spirited debates in the public square? What happened to dissecting ideas rather than people? Why can we not have a “grown-up” discussions with people of different persuasions, rather than all of the childish backbiting attacks?

  • In support of a local roofer

    This past Thursday there was a scathing article written about the roofing project taking place at Pinon Elementary School. The article was concerning the issue between the school district, which didn’t following protocol when proceeding with construction, and the school board. An unintended consequence of the article was the projected ineptness of McPartlon Roofing.
     Numerous times throughout the article, school board representative Mrs. McKinley, who seems to have it out for McPartlon Roofing, was quoted bad mouthing the contractor of a profession she clearly doesn’t understand.
     Nor did it seem that a portion of the school board fully understand that contractors, roofing or otherwise, often times have to follow the school districts insurance policy as opposed to the procedures recommended by their governing bodies. This course of action lends itself to contractors completing work that “worked best on the last project,” as opposed to completing work the proper way by following material manufactures installation guidelines.

  • Councilor boot camp

    This past week our newest county councilor Rick Reiss and councilors-elect Kristin Henderson, Pete Sheehey and Steve Girrens attended a County Governance Boot Camp in Albuquerque.
    Though no physical training, close order drills or snap inspections were involved, we were indoctrinated to several aspects of county commissioner service including roles and responsibilities, ethics and professionalism, employment law, finance policy, jail management and liability, statutory government structure and legislative process.  
    We also heard from veteran commissioners conveying lessons learned and their insights relative to current issues statewide.  
    The Boot Camp was hosted by the New Mexico Association of Counties of which Los Alamos County is a member.  More than 100 elected officials and county managers were in attendance.  We were particularly impressed by a few counties who had all standing and new commissioners as well as their county manager attending as a team.   The presentations and experiences delivered were informative, eye-opening and in some cases a little sobering.  
    Regardless, we have confidence we will remain enthusiastic to join our three veteran councilors and serve.  Our county administrator encouraged we attend Boot Camp.  Thank you Harry!

  • Economic development

    Taco Bell, long gone.
    KFC, long gone.
    Pizza Hut (both) gone.
    McDonalds White Rock, gone.
    Blockbuster, gone.
    Brownells, gone, space empty.
    Otowi Station, gone, space empty.
    Several empty commercial spaces on Central, downtown.
    Hilltop House, foreclosure, future unknown.
    Los Alamos Lodge, closed.
    The Hive, may close, financial trouble.
    Trinity Site, dirt (lots and lots of dirt).
    Where is all the “Economic Development” our local politicians have been spending our money on?
    Maybe we need some kind of  committee or some consultants to determine if “Economic Development” is even possible here in Los Alamos.
    If it’s not, lets not spend more money on another foolish endeavor.
    R D Little
    Los Alamos

     

  • Laws need to be enforced

    The Sunday morning Los Alamos Monitor reminded us of just how close we came to killing some children at the Montessori School on Canyon Road. Why?
    Because as County Engineer Kyle Zimmerman tells us, our safety is  held hostage by a few “irrational” drivers.
    Not only do we not control them, but it seems difficult to even know  who the people are who are trying to kill us, including another driver who crashed the same week on Main Hill Road while,  driving aggressively and passing another vehicle.
    Often, we don’t even know if the motorists were even cited!
    Perhaps the first level of dealing with dangerous drivers is not to ask the county to spend more money on traffic studies to change speed  limits, but to arrest and prosecute reckless and careless drivers, put their faces in newspapers, and take away their driver’s licenses. After all, these are often not “accidents” caused by bad weather or poor facilities. They are caused by deliberate risk  taking —because there seems to be no risk to being held accountable by the community.
    Driving is not a right. When you abuse your driving privileges and endanger the community, you must lose that privilege. It’s about time we made that stick. Preferably, before there is innocent blood spilled in the road.