When it comes to our public policy conversation, we have slurped our rhetorical Kool-Aid for a long, long time. We hustle the federal government for money while saying we should build the private sector while saying bad things about the government impact on the state.
For example, a few days ago President Barack Obama designated about 500,000 acres near Las Cruces as a national monument, to applause from Sens. Martin Heinrich and Tom Udall. Much of the land, though I’m not sure how much, is already federal and therefore hardly unregulated. Heinrich and Udall, good statists that they are, wanted the even tighter restrictions that would come with creating a wilderness area.
This is unequivocally good because, according to an economic impact study, “the national monument will generate $7.4 million in new economic activity annually and create 88 new jobs,” said the New Mexico Green Chamber of Commerce last year.
No word on the ranchers who having been using the land.
With the new monument, we see Heinrich and Udall nurturing the federal dollar. The anguish greeting the Senate retirements of Pete Domenici and Jeff Bingaman is recent on the scale of our relationship with federal money.