- Special Sections
- Public Notices
Water hasn’t gotten much legislative attention this year. Maybe that’s why one bill with far reaching consequences has passed its first committee.
HB 109 would allow water permit applicants who disagree with the state engineer’s initial decisions to appeal directly to district court. In other words, a dissatisfied applicant could bypass practice and precedent and see if the courts would hand down a more favorable decision.
This is wrong on so many levels. It allows anyone who can afford a lawyer to short circuit the system. Introduced by a lawyer, Rep. Nate Gentry, R-Albuquerque, the bill has lawyer job security written all over it.
Recently, the state engineer denied an application to pipe water from Fort Sumner to the Rio Grande for use in Santa Fe. What if an application like this went directly to court?
The system ain’t broke and doesn’t need fixing. Currently, a dissatisfied applicant must work through the agency’s processes, which usually resolve grievances to everyone’s satisfaction, but if they don’t, then the applicant can go to court.
If you currently subscribe or have subscribed in the past to the Los Alamos Monitor, then simply find your account number on your mailing label and enter it below.
Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.
If you are new to the award winning Los Alamos Monitor and wish to get a subscription or simply gain access to our online content then please enter your ZIP code below and continue to setup your account.