OMG! Did you see the front page of the Jan. 3 Los Alamos Monitor? I guess I just don’t get it. Am I the only one who thinks the North American Development Group (NADG) proposal for Trinity Site is exactly what we already have?
Just look at the drawing, come on folks, I could have come up with that for a lot less $$$. If this drawing depicts what “we” are looking for then gosh darn it plant a bunch of trees in the current Smith’s parking lot and have Smith’s expand into the property they already own.
The exact same thing proposed by NADG can be accomplished with the area currently occupied. If this proposal is accepted, what happens to the area where Smiths is currently located? Does it become a vacant wasteland and lost revenues for those left behind?
Are we trading one area for another. At a minimum, both sides of Trinity must be considered for development, are we going to have one modern development on one side of the road and leave the old (and mostly vacant if Smith’s moves) on the other side of the road?
If you currently subscribe or have subscribed in the past to the Los Alamos Monitor, then simply find your account number on your mailing label and enter it below.
Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.
If you are new to the award winning Los Alamos Monitor and wish to get a subscription or simply gain access to our online content then please enter your ZIP code below and continue to setup your account.
| ZIP Code: | |