- Special Sections
- Public Notices
I read that Los Alamos has some 500 “poverty level” people or families. I enjoyed a related observation that a city as rich as ours should be able to do something.
I don’t understand some things. The overall question is whether these individuals or families are below poverty level because of unforeseen and uncontrollable circumstances, or whether they are just suffering the consequences of bad decisions. It would be helpful to have a lot more data about the situation:
Are these old people, whose fixed incomes have not kept up with the expenses — like UC’s (University of California) 2 percent per year?
Are these young people who have returned to live with their parents and do or do not have jobs?
Are these young people who grew up here and just don’t want to leave and do or do not have jobs?
Are these people who moved into town to work (like at McDonald’s) who do not make above the poverty level income? Are these singles, married or (are they) related to someone in town?
Can one unmarried member of a household be classified as “poverty level” without counting the joint income of the household?
Is the poverty caused by divorce or abandonment?
Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.