- Special Sections
- Public Notices
Without entering whether the currently planned Trinity Site development is desirable or not — it’s already been a lengthy and probably continuing slog — I do object to George Chandler’s divisions of opinions in his op- ed of Jan. 3.
Classifying opinion holders as “nattering nabobs of negativity” as opposed to “positive visionaries” (does he consider himself one of those?) is about as useful a dividing opinion holder as “fair representatives of the community” versus “the opinioned who think they know better.”
That may be just as, if not, more accurate. But this kind of labeling just deepens a divide on a number of issues here.
We are far better served when folks state their views and their reasons without getting cutesy about those they disagree with.
Robert A. Nunz
If you currently subscribe or have subscribed in the past to the Los Alamos Monitor, then simply find your account number on your mailing label and enter it below.
Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.
If you are new to the award winning Los Alamos Monitor and wish to get a subscription or simply gain access to our online content then please enter your ZIP code below and continue to setup your account.