- Special Sections
- Public Notices
As I understand it, the recent Supreme Court decision reaffirmed the right of habeus corpus to all accused persons within the legal jurisdiction of the United States. I am not a lawyer but understand that habeus corpus translates to “do you have a body?” to prove that a crime was actually committed. This has been a fundamental principle of our western law system for centuries. An accused person cannot be held unless there is proof that a crime was committed.
The alternative to the right of habeus corpus is a system in which anyone can be imprisoned indefinitely, without being charged, or indeed without any proof that a crime was committed. Is this the American way? I think not, and the Supreme Court has rightfully reaffirmed our Anglo-American judicial system.
Robert Seegmiller, in his possibly sarcastic letter to the Monitor (June 24) seems to agree with John McCain and Newt Gingrich that this right should not apply to all people within American jurisdiction – for instance, as the editorial-page cartoon on the same page suggests, to the prisoners at Gitmo, some of which have been separated from their homes and families for years without being charged.
If you currently subscribe or have subscribed in the past to the Los Alamos Monitor, then simply find your account number on your mailing label and enter it below.
Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.
If you are new to the award winning Los Alamos Monitor and wish to get a subscription or simply gain access to our online content then please enter your ZIP code below and continue to setup your account.