- Special Sections
- Public Notices
The nation’s bitter dispute over climate change drags public discourse to new extremes of futility. Worse yet, the hostile views of man-made climate change expand into a kindred dispute about the tools of science itself.
The fray sharpens three key observations:
• Each side says the opposing side is afraid to answer questions about weak points in its case.
• Each side says its foe distorts how science advances by constant questioning.
• Each side says its foe’s energy ambitions corrupt its science.
In sum, each party says those other guys have trampled on the methods of science.
These parallel views bring to mind a fair means that is the pride of democracy — the jury system.
Imagine a mock trial — or call it a “test run” — to judge whether man-made climate change is true or false, and to what extent. A test run follows all the same rules as a legal trial, except the jury’s verdict is not legally binding on anyone.
To find answers, a trial has set procedures, each step of which is infixed in all parties by the judge and the force of law. The familiar term “contempt of court” means someone ignored a required procedure.
Specified steps include:
If you currently subscribe or have subscribed in the past to the Los Alamos Monitor, then simply find your account number on your mailing label and enter it below.
Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.
If you are new to the award winning Los Alamos Monitor and wish to get a subscription or simply gain access to our online content then please enter your ZIP code below and continue to setup your account.