- Special Sections
- Public Notices
This column is an experiment in enhancing the public dialogue. The six candidates for governor were asked a question about an important policy matter outside the common rhetoric of the campaign. I hoped the topic plus the length of the answer, no more than 75 words, would induce some thought on the part of the candidate. The answers would be printed here without editing or comment, other than if an answer wasn’t germane. You compare and contrast. Ask yourself if the answers are relevant and useful.
I assumed that all candidates would respond to the request for comment and answer the question and gave them four days to respond. All candidates responded. The comment I requested was on Section 14 of the special session’s House Bill 2, “Authority to Reduce Allotments.” It says that if fiscal 2011 general fund projected revenue is short of the appropriations, the governor “shall reduce general fund allotments” and describes the approach.
This is a highly unusual delegation of legislative prerogative. Is this a good idea? A bad idea? A useful idea, given the governor’s continued lack of leadership in addressing the state’s revenue and spending situation?
Here are the responses:
If you currently subscribe or have subscribed in the past to the Los Alamos Monitor, then simply find your account number on your mailing label and enter it below.
Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.
If you are new to the award winning Los Alamos Monitor and wish to get a subscription or simply gain access to our online content then please enter your ZIP code below and continue to setup your account.